Holiday Ayo - FIFA's decision to appoint the host of the 2030 and 2034 World Cups has sparked global controversy.

With no competing bids, the announcement on Wednesday (11/12) was considered a mere formality. However, criticism of the process and its implications continues to come.

The 2030 World Cup will be held on three continents. Morocco, Spain and Portugal will be the main hosts.

Meanwhile, Uruguay, Argentina and Paraguay will hold the opening match as a tribute to the history of the first World Cup. Meanwhile, the 2034 World Cup will be awarded to Saudi Arabia.

The awarding of hosting rights for the two prestigious tournaments will be done through a vote during the FIFA Congress which will be held virtually. The winner will be undisputed because no other bid is considered ideal.

The 2030 World Cup will mark a century since the first World Cup was held in Uruguay. As a result, Uruguay will be given a quota to host one opening match along with Argentina and Paraguay.

Meanwhile, the main match will be held by Morocco, Spain and Portugal. The decision is unprecedented as it will involve three different continental confederations.

There has been criticism, particularly from climate activists, who have warned of the environmental impact of extra travel. FIFA has pledged to reduce its environmental impact but the decision has been seen as the opposite.

Saudi Arabia is the sole bidder to host the 2034 World Cup after Australia and Indonesia withdrew.

Saudi Arabia has also drawn criticism for paving the way for the World Cup to return to the Gulf after Qatar successfully hosted the 2022 World Cup.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has used sport for some time to gain influence and boost his global image, according to AFP.

Human rights groups have highlighted mass executions in Saudi Arabia and allegations of torture, as well as restrictions on women's rights under a patriarchal system. Freedom of expression is also severely restricted in the country.

Saudi has previously hosted several major events including Formula One and the WTA Finals tennis tournament.

These decisions have been accused of 'sportwashing', or using sport to distract attention from human rights abuses.